Details
How Everyday Forms of Racial Categorization Survived Imperialist Censuses in Puerto Rico
|
64,19 € |
|
| Verlag: | Palgrave Macmillan |
| Format: | |
| Veröffentl.: | 29.09.2021 |
| ISBN/EAN: | 9783030825188 |
| Sprache: | englisch |
Dieses eBook enthält ein Wasserzeichen.
Beschreibungen
<p>This book examines the history of racial classifications in Puerto Rico censuses, starting with the Spanish censuses and continuing through the US ones. Because Puerto Rican censuses were collected regularly over hundreds of years, they are fascinating “test cases” to see what census categories might have been available and effective in shaping everyday ones. Published twentieth-century censuses have been well studied, but this book also examines unpublished documents in previous centuries to understand the historical precursors of contemporary ones. State-centered theories hypothesize that censuses, especially colonial ones, have powerful transformative effects. In contrast, this book shows that such transformations are affected by the power and interests of social actors, not the strength of the state. Thus, despite hundreds of years of exposure to the official dichotomous and trichotomous census categories, these categories never replaced the continuous everyday ones because thecensus categories rarely coincided with Puerto Rican’s interests.<br></p>
Chapter 1: Potential of Censuses to Transformation Categorization.- Chapter 2: Methods.- Chapter 3: Spanish Mercantilist Censuses.- Chapter 4: Spanish Imperialist Censuses.- Chapter 5: US Imperialist Censuses.- Chapter 6: Assessing Explanations of Transformations in Categories.
Rebecca Jean Emigh is Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Los Angeles, USA. She studies long-term processes of social change, particularly how cultural, economic, and demographic factors intersect to create those processes. With Dylan Riley and Patricia Ahmed, she is the author of <i>Antecedents of Censuses from Medieval to Nation States: How Societies and States Count</i> and<i> Changes in Censuses from Imperialist to Welfare States: How Societies and States Count. </i><div><i><br></i></div><div>Patricia Ahmed is Senior Lecturer in Sociology at South Dakota State University, USA. Her research interests include comparative/historical sociology, cross-cultural sociology, and globalization.<i><br></i><i><br></i>Dylan Riley is Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Berkeley, USA. He studies capitalism, socialism, democracy, authoritarianism, and knowledge regimes in a broad comparative and historical perspective.<br><br><br></div>
<div><p>“By looking at the complex history of the colonial censuses in Puerto Rico, this book offers rare insights into the politics of the census and the limits of empire’s classificatory schemes to transform colonized people’s everyday categories.”</p>
<p>—<b>Julian Go</b>, Professor of Sociology, The University of Chicago</p><p>“Concise and convincing, this book showcases how daily practices have the power to subvert powerful imperialist states. The book—analyzing state censuses in Puerto Rico from 1530 to the 21<sup>st</sup> century—is a welcoming addition to the literature of empire, race relations, and day-to-day racial practices. Definitively, a must read!”<br></p><p>—<b>Rosa Elena Carrasquillo</b>, Professor of Caribbean/Latin American History, College of the Holy Cross</p></div><div><br></div><div>This book examines the history of racial classifications in Puerto Rico censuses, starting with the Spanish censuses and continuing through the US ones. Because Puerto Rican censuses were collected regularly over hundreds of years, they are fascinating “test cases” to see what census categories might have been available and effective in shaping everyday ones. Published twentieth-century censuses have been well studied, but this book also examines unpublished documents in previous centuries to understand the historical precursors of contemporary ones. State-centered theories hypothesize that censuses, especially colonial ones, have powerful transformative effects. In contrast, this book shows that such transformations are affected by the power and interests of social actors, not the strength of the state. Thus, despite hundreds of years of exposure to the official dichotomous and trichotomous census categories, these categories never replaced the continuous everyday ones because the census categories rarely coincided with Puerto Rican’s interests.<br></div><div><p><b>Rebecca Jean Emigh</b> is Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Los Angeles, USA. </p>
<p><b>Patricia Ahmed</b> is Senior Lecturer in Sociology at South Dakota State University, USA. </p><p><b>Dylan Riley</b> is Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Berkeley, USA. </p></div>
<p>—<b>Julian Go</b>, Professor of Sociology, The University of Chicago</p><p>“Concise and convincing, this book showcases how daily practices have the power to subvert powerful imperialist states. The book—analyzing state censuses in Puerto Rico from 1530 to the 21<sup>st</sup> century—is a welcoming addition to the literature of empire, race relations, and day-to-day racial practices. Definitively, a must read!”<br></p><p>—<b>Rosa Elena Carrasquillo</b>, Professor of Caribbean/Latin American History, College of the Holy Cross</p></div><div><br></div><div>This book examines the history of racial classifications in Puerto Rico censuses, starting with the Spanish censuses and continuing through the US ones. Because Puerto Rican censuses were collected regularly over hundreds of years, they are fascinating “test cases” to see what census categories might have been available and effective in shaping everyday ones. Published twentieth-century censuses have been well studied, but this book also examines unpublished documents in previous centuries to understand the historical precursors of contemporary ones. State-centered theories hypothesize that censuses, especially colonial ones, have powerful transformative effects. In contrast, this book shows that such transformations are affected by the power and interests of social actors, not the strength of the state. Thus, despite hundreds of years of exposure to the official dichotomous and trichotomous census categories, these categories never replaced the continuous everyday ones because the census categories rarely coincided with Puerto Rican’s interests.<br></div><div><p><b>Rebecca Jean Emigh</b> is Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Los Angeles, USA. </p>
<p><b>Patricia Ahmed</b> is Senior Lecturer in Sociology at South Dakota State University, USA. </p><p><b>Dylan Riley</b> is Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Berkeley, USA. </p></div>
Challenges the assumption that states are all-powerful in terms of classifying and enumerating their population Examines the role of lay understandings of the social world in crafting meaningful census categories Contributes to sociology, Latin American Studies, studies of race and ethnicity, and beyond
Diese Produkte könnten Sie auch interessieren:
